The index page for the 1954 French flap section of this website is here.
Reference for this case: 27-Sep-54-Villefranche-de-Lauragais.
Please cite this reference in any correspondence with me regarding this case.
In the 2000's, a US ufology website indicated that according to Jacque Vallée's computerized catalog, on September 27, 1954, at 08:00 p.m. in "Villefranche-Laurag", France, "An unidentified object was sighted, but with appearance and behavior that most likely would have a conventional explanation. One object was observed."
A german ufology database then noted the same information, misspell included, but without the note on the lack of strangeness.
[Ref. uda1:] "UFODNA" WEBSITE:
The website indicates that on 27 September 1954 at 20:00 in Villefranche-Laurag, France, "An unidentified object was sighted, but with appearance and behavior that most likely would have a conventional explanation. One object was observed."
The source is indicated as Vallee, Jacques, Computerized Catalog (N = 3073).
[Ref. ubk1:] "UFO-DATENBANK":
| Case Nr. | New case Nr. | Investigator | Date of observation | Zip | Place of observation | Country of observation | Hour of observation | Classification | Comments | Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19540927 | 27.09.1954 | Villefranche Laurag | France | 20.00 | NL |
|
Probably a duplicate created by Jacques Vallée, about the case that day in Lanta near Villefranche-de-Lauraget.
The date is not certain, and the time "20:00" probably invented from the indication by the press that it was in the evening.
(These keywords are only to help queries and are not implying anything.)
Villefranche-de-Lauragais, Haute-Garonne, Villefranche-Laurag, night
[----] indicates sources that are not yet available to me.
| Version: | Created/Changed by: | Date: | Change Description: |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | Patrick Gross | February 8, 2010 | First published. |
| 1.1 | Patrick Gross | February 9, 2017 | Addition [ubk1]. |
| 1.2 | Patrick Gross | July 27, 2019 | Addition of the Summary. Explanations changed, were "Not looked for yet." |
