All that is known about this case is that Spanish ufologist Antonio Ribera Ribera wrote that a woman reported to have seen a strange entity resembling a cactus with four members, leaving deep traces, on December 3, 1967, in Barcelona, Spain, and that this woman did not want to comment.
|
|
[Ref. jf1:] JEAN FERGUSON:
The author indicates that on December 3, 1967 in Barcelona in Spain, a woman met a strange small entity resembling a cactus with four members leaving deep traces.
[Ref. js1:] JACQUES SCORNAUX:
Jacques Scornaux indicates that in Barcelona, in Spain, on December 3, 1967, a case on which the information is extremely sparse took place, and he quotes:
"A woman reported to have seen a strange entity resembling a cactus with four members, leaving deep traces. The witness does not want to comment on the case. (Ribera) (162)."
As no book or magazine title was indicated, he notes that it can be assumed that it was a personal communication from Antonio Ribera to the authors of the study on the Iberian landings, quoted as reference 162.
On May 9, 1984, one of the authors, well-known Spanish ufologist Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos, wrote to him in connection with this case:
"It is only a rumour which cannot constitute a serious entry in a catalogue."
Scornaux notes that thit "of course did not prevent this case from slipping into Ted Phillips' catalogue (19, p. 54), with mention of the traces."
[Ref. ar1:] ALBERT ROSALES:
Albert Rosales indicates in his catalogue that in Barcelona, Spain, on December 3, 1967, at an unknown time, a woman reported seeing a strange cactus-like entity with four members, leaving deep footprints. The witness does not want to discuss the incident, and there is no other information.
Albert Rosales indicates that the source is Antonio Ribera.
[Ref. dj1:] DONALD JOHNSON:
Donald Johnson indicates in his chronology that on December 3, 1967, in Barcelona, Spain a "cactus-like" entity with four appendages, presumably two arms and two legs, was sighted. It left deep footprints in the soil.
The source is indicated as "Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos investigation files".
This is an exemplary case of the unusable anecdote reproduced from catalogues to books to catalogues. The lack of even the most basic data such as the hour and the place, the absence of UFO, the absence of investigation, a reluctant, unnamed, undetermined, unique witness, makes it totally unjusify to include the case in a catalogue of physical traces of the UFOS like Ted Phillips did.
Id: | Topic: | Severity: | Date noted: | Raised by: | Noted by: | Description: | Proposal: | Status: |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Data | Severe | May 24, 2007 | Patrick Gross | Patrick Gross | Insufficient data. | Help needed. | Opened. |
2 | Ufology | Severe | May 24, 2007 | Patrick Gross | Patrick Gross | Insufficient data. | Help needed. | Opened. |
3 | Ufology | Severe | May 24, 2007 | Patrick Gross | Patrick Gross | Unique, unnamed, reluctant, undetermined witness. | - | - |
4 | Ufology | Medium | May 24, 2007 | Patrick Gross | Patrick Gross | Case with no UFO. | - | - |
No credibility. Insufficient data.
* = Source I checked.
? = Source I am told about but could not check yet. Help appreciated.
Main Author: | Patrick Gross |
---|---|
Contributors: | None |
Reviewers: | None |
Editor: | Patrick Gross |
Version: | Created/Changed By: | Date: | Change Description: |
---|---|---|---|
0.1 | Patrick Gross | May 24, 2007 | Creation, [jf1], [js1], [ar1], [dj1]. |
0.2 | Patrick Gross | May 24, 2007 | First published. |
2.0 | Patrick Gross | October 17, 2011 | Conversion from HTML4 to XHTML Strict. |