JANUARY 22 1909, CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA, USA, TWO YOUNG GIRLS OR WOMEN:
Brief summary of the event and follow-up:
The authors of a reference book on the "Jersey Devil" say that on January 22, 1909, at dusk, two young woman, or girls, returning home near Chester, Pennsylvania, USA, heard a strange noise from a stopped train. It frightened them.
The "Jersey Devil" darted out of a boxcar, sailed close by and disappeared.
Basic information table:
Case number:
URECAT-001526
Date of event:
January 22, 1909
Earliest report of event:
1909?
Delay of report:
Days, weeks?
Witness reported via:
Not known.
First alleged record by:
Not known.
First certain record by:
Jersey Devil book McCloy and Miller.
First alleged record type:
Not known.
First certain record type:
Jersey Devil book McCloy and Miller.
This file created on:
July 17, 2013
This file last updated on:
July 17, 2013
Country of event:
USA
State/Department:
Pennsylvania
Type of location:
Outside.
Lighting conditions:
Not reported. Dusk.
UFO observed:
No
UFO arrival observed:
N/A
UFO departure observed:
N/A
UFO/Entity Relation:
None
Witnesses numbers:
2
Witnesses ages:
Not reported. Young.
Witnesses types:
Not reported. Young women or girls.
Photograph(s):
No.
Witnesses drawing:
No.
Witnesses-approved drawing:
No.
Number of entities:
1
Type of entities:
Not reported
Entities height:
Not reported
Entities outfit type:
Not reported.
Entities outfit color:
Not reported.
Entities skin color:
Not reported.
Entities body:
Not reported.
Entities head:
Not reported.
Entities eyes:
Not reported.
Entities mouth:
Not reported.
Entities nose:
Not reported.
Entities feet:
Not reported.
Entities arms:
Not reported. Probable wings
Entities fingers:
Not reported.
Entities fingers number:
Not reported.
Entities hair:
Not reported.
Entities voice:
Uncertain.
Entities actions:
Came out of stopped boxcar, flew away.
Entities/witness interactions:
None.
Witness(es) reactions:
Observed.
Witness(es) feelings:
Frightened.
Witness(es) interpretation:
Not reported.
Explanation category:
Probable confusion, bird, sandhill crane or barn owl.
The authors say that on January 22, 1909, at dusk, two young woman returning home near Chester, Pennsylvania, heard a strange noise from a stopped train. It frightened them.
The Devil darted out of a boxcar, sailed close by and disappeared.
The authors say that on January 22, 1909, in Chester, PA, two girls heard a noise coming from a stopped train, and watched the Jersey Devil fly out of an open boxcar and take off in the sky.
Points to consider:
Before discussing this particular case, I must make some general remarks about what was called the "Jersey Devil".
In Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, for nearly two centuries at least, some people give reports of encounters with a "creature" whose descriptions suggested that it was some sort of "devil", though in my opinion it was often merely a large bird in migration there, the sandhill crane.
Ufologically, these stories are mostly not considered as related in any way with UFOs or UFO occupants, in my opinion too they should not be part of a catalog of "close encounters of the third kind".
However, some ufologists included such stories in such catalogs, thinking for some reason it does have something to do with the UFO question. Most of the time, they do not include all the Jersey Devil reports, but only a few of them, maybe due to lack of documentation or maybe for some other reason I do not understand.
So I have to include all these stories, because if some source considers, rightly or wrongly, that this a UFO-related, then it is within my scope, not to immediately and arbitrarily disregard their idea, but to evaluate it, and thus to collect the documentation and the comments about it. And therefore, I have to check and document all reported, not just those selected arbitrarily by these ufologists who believed this is UFO material. This is why you cans see I have a file for each Jersey Devil reports, even those that were never included in the ufology literature.
I should note that most stories are fragmentary, often because the sources write about several observations, and what is said about one report is supposed to be implicitly true for the others. I do not do it that way; I publish case files individually and discuss each on its own merits or issues, and offer a specific assessment for each case. But of course, generalities can be said on these reports. As I do not want to disconnect individual reports from these generalities, I make the following notes.
I want to first list the various explanations offered for the "Jersey Devil" - they could apply its late equivalent the West Virginia "Mothman" which was introduced in UFO books the 1960s:
"Devil" per se, a creature from hell, the one that Christian traditions talks about. It is not far from the explanations that claimed "witches" made this Devil appear using witchcraft.
"Devil" in the sense that there would be some sort of "parallel world" that shelters evil creatures who occasionally pop in "our" world. It is further argued that UFOs and their occupants are of the same nature, in an attempt to support a "theory of everything" claiming the existence of some "other worlds" or "parallel worlds or "other dimensions".
UFO occupants, aliens; some rare ufologists seem to consider that any unusual creature must come down from some spacecraft, whether it is a "Bigfoot", "Chupacabras", "Devil" or whatever else. A variant thereof proposes that all these creatures are "engineered" by more "classic" extraterrestrial beings.
Some cryptozoologists put forth that the "Jersey Devil" is some ordinary earthly animal hitherto undiscovered by mainstream science. Most cryptozoologist do not vehemently claim this as if it was a proven fact, but merely suggest it is a possibility among other possibilities.
Some cryptozoologists felt that the Jersey Devil may be a "Bigfoot". This generally does not fit well with the descriptions, whereas a known bird fits better. Yes, some reports mention a four-legged creature, but generally with wings too.
It was suggested the Jersey Devil is a Pterodactyl, the prehistoric dinosaur-bird, allegedly still living nowadays. Or some other survivor of the distant prehistoric times.
An investigation by cryptozoologist Ivan Sanderson made him explain that there was a real estate scam in 1909 there in which people had created false traces of the "Jersey Devil." Most debaters admit this, but consider, rightly in my opinion, it could not be the single explanation for all the reports. This does not mean that other reports could not be hoaxes too, and some definitely were, as the "Hyman" case or the case of the dead kangaroo fitted with wings.
Some offer a pure "folklore" explanation. There would never have been any true observation, everything would be purely invented nonsense. It can obviously be suggested that some, if not all, of the stories are of this nature. It is clear that a Jersey Devil folklore has emerged, but it cannot be used as evidence that all reports were entirely imaginary from the start.
At the time, a "malformed" and abandoned child ("the baby of Mrs. Leeds") was said to be the explanation. But it turned out that the descriptions, the geographical and temporal span, leave little credence to this explanation if it was supposed to be the only one.
Various birds were named as an explanation for the Jersey Devil. Some are completely unsuitable, too small or too different from the descriptions. However, one bird seems to be an excellent candidate, the sandhill crane. In each of my "Jersey Devil" case file, I obviously check this explanation out. I am neither the first nor the only one to propose it, however, many authors made no mention of the sandhill crane, preferring to highlight the ridiculous "explanation" explanations to support their favorite one. For example they would ridicule the "Mrs. Leeds' baby" explanation to try to convince the Jersey Devil must have been "supernatural".
Now let's see this report.
The first thing is that there is almost no data at all in the report - see the List of Issues below.
Then, we have no description of the entity at all except that it flies. So it can be just about any bird, the famous sandhill crane, or just an owl. The witness age is not given, but it seems they were young; it was at dusk, so it is not unreasonable to think that the girls were simply frightened by some impressive bird, at a time when everyone claimed there was a "Devil" out there.
There is not enough information to make this explanation a certainty, but there is not a single piece of information that would support the notion that the witnesses saw a real devil, or an alien, or a pterodactyl, "Bigfoot" or anything extraordinary.
"Sandhill Crane" (Grus canadensis) - pictures above - is a species of big crane living in North America, Canada, and in the extreme northeast of Siberia. Some are resident, some are migratory, passing sometimes indeed by the states where the "Jersey Devil" was reported.
Probable confusion, bird, sandhill crane or barn owl.
Sources references:
* = Source I checked.
? = Source I am told about but could not check yet. Help appreciated.
[mm1] * "The Jersey Devil", book by James F. McCloy, Ray Miller, Jr., Middle Atlantic Press publishers, USA, 1976.
[mm1] * "The Jersey Devil", book by James F. McCloy, Ray Miller, Jr., BB&A publishers, USA, page 70, 1987.
[np1] * "Run with the Devil: The Evil in Jersey’s Pines", article by Alan Cabal, New York Press website, July 18, 2000, at nypress.com/run-with-the-devil-the-evil-in-jerseys-pines
[dh1] * "Phenomenal Week", web page by Laura K. Leuter, the New Jersey Devils Hunters, USA, 2004, at www.njdevilhunters.com/1909.html
[ch1] * "Monsters of New Jersey: Mysterious Creatures in the Garden State", book by Loren Coleman, Bruce G. Hallenbeck, Stackpole Books publishers, USA, page 108, 2010.
