URECAT -> Homeclick!

Cette page en franšaisCliquez!

URECAT - UFO Related Entities Catalog

URECAT is a formal catalog of UFO related entities sightings reports with the goal of providing quality information for accurate studies of the topic. Additional information, corrections and reviews are welcome at patrick.gross@inbox.com, please state if you wish to be credited for your contribution or not. The main page of the URECAT catalog is here.

January 19, 1909, Pemberton, New Jersey, USA, Reverend John Pursell:

Brief summary of the event and follow-up:

All that seems to be reported is that on Wednesday, January 19, 1909, in the morning, Reverend John Pursell said of the Jersey Devil that he had never seen anything like it before.

Basic information table:

Case number: URECAT-001499
Date of event: January 19, 1909
Earliest report of event: Day, weeks, years?
Delay of report:
Witness reported via: Not known.
First alleged record by: Not known.
First certain record by: "Jersey Devil" book.
First alleged record type: Not known.
First certain record type: "Jersey Devil" book.
This file created on: April 5, 2013
This file last updated on: April 5, 2013
Country of event: USA
State/Department: New Jersey
Type of location: Not reported.
Lighting conditions: Not reported.
UFO observed: No
UFO arrival observed: N/A
UFO departure observed: N/A
UFO/Entity Relation: None
Witnesses numbers: 1
Witnesses ages: Not reported. Adult ot aged.
Witnesses types: Not reported. Man, Reverend.
Photograph(s): No.
Witnesses drawing: No.
Witnesses-approved drawing: No.

Narratives:

[Ref. mm1:] JAMES MCCLOY AND RAY MILLER:

The authors say that on Wednesday, January 19, 1909, in the morning, Reverend John Pursell said of the Jersey Devil that he had never seen anything like it before.

[Ref. dh1:] "NEW JERSEY DEVILS HUNTERS":

Number of entities: 1
Type of entities: Not reported
Entities height: Not reported
Entities outfit type: Not reported.
Entities outfit color: Not reported.
Entities skin color: Not reported.
Entities body: Not reported.
Entities head: Not reported.
Entities eyes: Not reported.
Entities mouth: Not reported.
Entities nose: Not reported.
Entities feet: Not reported.
Entities arms: Not reported.
Entities fingers: Not reported.
Entities fingers number: Not reported.
Entities hair: Not reported.
Entities voice: Not reported.
Entities actions: Not reported.
Entities/witness interactions: Not reported.
Witness(es) reactions: Observed.
Witness(es) feelings: Not reported.
Witness(es) interpretation: Not reported.
Explanation category: Totally insufficient data.
Explanation certainty: Medium.

Wed. 1/20

Pemberton, NJ

Reverend John Pursell saw the creature, stating he had "never seen anything like it before."

[Ref. uf1:] "UFO FYI" WEBSITE:

[...] Reverend John Pursell of Pemberton saw the Jersey Devil. Rev. Pursell said, "Never saw anything like it before".

[Ref. gm1:] "JERSEY DEVIL" GOOGLE MAP:

Pemberton, NJ January 20, 1909

Reverend John Pursell, after seeing the Jersey Devil, claimed he had "never seen anything like it before."

Points to consider:

Nothing can be said about this particular case, but I must make some general remarks about what was called the "Jersey Devil".

In Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, for nearly two centuries at least, some people give reports of encounters with a "creature" whose descriptions suggested that it was some sort of "devil", though in my opinion it was often merely a large bird in migration there, the sandhill crane.

Ufologically, these stories are mostly not considered as related in any way with UFOs or UFO occupants, in my opinion too they should not be part of a catalog of "close encounters of the third kind".

However, some ufologists included such stories in such catalogs, thinking for some reason it does have something to do with the UFO question. Most of the time, they do not include all the Jersey Devil reports, but only a few of them, maybe due to lack of documentation or maybe for some other reason I do not understand.

So I have to include all these stories, because if some source considers, rightly or wrongly, that this a UFO-related, then it is within my scope, not to immediately and arbitrarily disregard their idea, but to evaluate it, and thus to collect the documentation and the comments about it. And therefore, I have to check and document all reported, not just those selected arbitrarily by these ufologists who believed this is UFO material. This is why you cans see I have a file for each Jersey Devil reports, even those that were never included in the ufology literature.

I should note that most stories are fragmentary, often because the sources write about several observations, and what is said about one report is supposed to be implicitly true for the others. I do not do it that way; I publish case files individually and discuss each on its own merits or issues, and offer a specific assessment for each case. But of course, generalities can be said on these reports. As I do not want to disconnect individual reports from these generalities, I make the following notes.

I want to list the various explanations offered for the "Jersey Devil" - they could apply its late equivalent the West Virginia "Mothman" which was introduced in UFO books the 1960s:

List of issues:

Id: Topic: Severity: Date noted: Raised by: Noted by: Description: Proposal: Status:
1 Data Severe October 4, 2009 Patrick Gross Patrick Gross Help needed. Opened.

Evaluation:

Totally insufficient data.

Sources references:

* = Source I checked.
? = Source I am told about but could not check yet. Help appreciated.

Document history:

Authoring

Main Author: Patrick Gross
Contributors: None
Reviewers: None
Editor: Patrick Gross

Changes history

Version: Created/Changed By: Date: Change Description:
0.1 Patrick Gross April 5, 2013 Creation, [mm1], [dh1], [uf1], [gm1].
1.0 Patrick Gross April 5, 2013 First published.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict



 Feedback  |  Top  |  Back  |  Forward  |  Map  |  List |  Home
This page was last updated on April 5, 2013.