ALSACAT-2012-03-07-HEILIGENBERG-1
On March 7, 2012, about noon, a retired Heiligenberg man observed with the naked eye from the courtyard of his house, an airliner at an altitude he estimated at approximately 10,000 meters.
This aircraft was followed by three objects "forming a triangle", moving to the north in a cloudless and slightly hazy sky.
The objects were very near the tail of the airliner, and they switched position. The witness heard a sound of normal airliner, and did not hear any noise of supersonic fighter aircraft.
When the plane disappeared gradually to the north, the objects still followed; the sighting lasted about three minutes.
The witness contacted GEIPAN a month later by sending them the completed GEIPAN report form.
Military air traffic control informed GEIPAN, referring to military operations and their radar records, that it was a C-135 tanker with one Mirage 2000 and two Rafale jet fighters following, performing an aerial refueling operation.
Date: | March 7, 2012 |
---|---|
Time: | ~Noon |
Duration: | ~3 minutes. |
First known report date: | April 11, 2012 |
Reporting delay: | 1 month. |
Department: | Bas-Rhin |
---|---|
City: | Heiligenberg |
Place: | From the court of his house, UFO in the sky. |
Latitude: | 48.538 |
Longitude: | 7.384 |
Uncertainty radius: | 20 m |
Number of alleged witnesses: | 1 |
---|---|
Number of known witnesses: | 1 |
Number of named witnesses: | 1 |
Witness(es) ages: | 63 |
Witness(es) types: | Retired reseident. |
Reporting channel: | Reported directly to GEIPAN. |
---|---|
Type of location: | From the court of his house, UFO in the sky. |
Visibility conditions: | Day, clear sky, sunny, sunlight from behind. |
UFO observed: | Yes |
UFO arrival observed: | ? |
UFO departure observed: | Yes |
Entities: | No |
Photographs: | No. |
Sketch(s) by witness(es): | Yes. |
Sketch(es) approved by witness(es): | Yes. |
Witness(es) feelings: | ? |
Witnesses interpretation: | ? |
Hynek: | DD |
---|---|
ALSACAT: | Jet fighters in aerial refueling. |
[Ref. gei1:] GROUPE D'ETUDES ET D'INFORMATIONS SUR LES PHENOMENES AEROSPATIAUX NON IDENTIFIES (G.E.I.P.A.N.):
HEILIGENBERG (67) 03/07/2012 | |
Observed on: | 03/07/2012 | Region: | Alsace |
Department: | Rhin (Bas) |
Class: | A |
Summary: | Observation of the passage of a plane followed by three objects forming a triangle: aerial military maneuvers. |
Description: |
On March 7, 2012, around noon, a witness is intrigued by the passage in the sky of an airliner followed by three objects forming a triangle. The objects are very close to the tail of the plane and they interchanged their places behind the airliner. The observer has witnessed exceptional maneuvering of military aircraft. The detailed explanation is given in the attached document (radar trace). This case is classified "A": observation of aerial military maneuvers. |
Report: | None. |
Details of the testimony |
|
Witness | |
Date of the observation | 03/07/2012 |
Document number | |
Age | Adult (more than 60) |
Occupation | Retired |
Sex | Male |
Reaction | Active Curiosity |
Credibility | |
Conditions | |
Environment | Home |
Weather conditions | Clear Sky |
Hour of the observation | Numbered : noon - 2 p.m. |
Reference frame | Sky or clouds |
Distance between phenomenon and witness | Very far (more than 1 km) |
Start of the observation | Start of the observation by witness |
End of the observation | End of the observation by phenomenon |
Localization | |
Angle of the site | Aa the Zenit;Not-specified |
Direction of observation | Not-Specified |
Heading | Not-Specified |
Trajectory | Straight line;Straight line |
Nature of the observation | Object |
Caracteristic of the observation | Multiple of different shape |
Global shape | Not-Specified |
Color | Not-Specified |
Apparent size | Not-Specified |
Apparent speed | Not-Specified |
Noise | Not-Specified |
Effect on the environment | Not-Specified |
Number | 2 |
Received April 11, 2012
CENTRE NATIONAL D'ETUDES SPATIALES
GROUPE D'ETUDES ET D'INFORMATIONS SUR LES PHENOMENES AEROSPATIAUX NON IDENTIFIES
PLACE FOR USE OF GEIPAN
Name of the case:
THE INFORMATIONS CONTENAINED IN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL REMAIN ANONYMOUS
WITNESS INFORMATION SHEET
Name:
Date of birth: 05/03/1949
Sex: M
Home address:
City: [-]
Email [-]
Mobile phone: [-]
Professional occupation: Retired
Traning level: BAC
Did you already report? If yes, to:
[ ] Gendarmerie - Squad:
[ ] GEIPAN - Name:
[ ] Enquêteur privé - Name:
[ ] Ufologist(s) - Name:
[ ] Journalist(s) - Name:
[ ] Internet (Forum) - Site:
[ ] Other - Name:
CNES-GEIPAN STANDARD INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE V2.01
Place of observation of the phenomenon: Heiligenberg
Exact address: 168 Rue Oberweg
City: HEILIGENBERG CP: 67190
Date of observation: MARCH 07, 2012
Age at the time of the observation: 63
Hour of the start of the observation: approx NOON (12 o'clock)
Duration of the observation: approx 3 mn
Did other witnesses see the same phenomenon, if so, how many:
Could you indicate by using the Google Map (http://maps.google.fr) website theplace of the observation, locating yourself and the phenomenon with a pencil.
1. Print the map from Google Map
2. Indicate your position, and that of the observation
When you have finished the questionnaire, check mark the documents you joined or filled:
Free narrative Attached [X]
Questionnaire [X]
Photographs of the environment (number: )
Sketch of the observed phenomenon (number: ) [X]
Google Map maps or plans (number: )
Photographs of the observation (number: )
Videos of the observation (number: )
Other:
CNES-GEIPAN STANDARD INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE V2.01 - Page 3
FREE NARRATIVE
Observation BaS-Rhin
That date Wednesday, March 7, 2012 - have observed around noon - Mutzig region - Place of observation: Heiligenberg - an airliner (altitude approx 10.000 m.) - Followed by 3 objects forming a triangle - moving to North - Clear sky - no clouds - slightly hazy - observation duration: approx 3 min - the objects were very close to the tail of the plane - saw these 3 objects switching positions - normal airliner noise - no sound of possible supersonic fighter - when the plane disappeared gradually northwards, these objects were still following - (attached sketch). Greetings [-].
This part is about knowing the physical environment in which you were at the time of the observation. Be as specific as possible with maximum numerical indications. Always indicate the margin uncertainty of the numbers you provide.
Weather conditions at the time of the observation
1.1 Indicate the color of the sky: Blue
1.2 Indicate the weather at the time of observation, try to give the most possible details even those who do not seem interesting, describe if there have been changes before, during and after the observation.
slight haze but good visibility
1.3 Indicate the presence of stars in the sky:
[ ] No visible star
[ ] Few stars
[ ] Starry sky
[ ] Extraordinarily starry sky
[ ] I did not pay attention
[ ] An obstacle prevented me to observe them
CNES-GEIPAN STANDARD INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE V2.01 - Page 7
Try to take one or several photos of your observations places. Photos are of a great help for the investigation.
1.4 Describe the environment you were in at the time of the observation. Provide as much detail as possible, even those that do not seem important to you, such as soil type, lights, etc.
observation made in the yard of my home (house)
1.5 Were you moving? No
1.6 Were you inside a vehicle? No
[ ] Bicyle
[ ] Car
[ ] Bus
[ ] Train
[ ] Hot air balloon
[ ] Deltaplane
[ ] Ultralight
[ ] Small plane
[ ] Commercial plane
[ ] Helicopter
[ ] Boat
[ ] Other:
Model and identification:
1.7 Were you inside a building? No
Nature of the building and room of observation:
1.8 Lighted or working equipments:
[ ] Radio (frequency: )
[ ] Headlights (number: )
[ ] Inside lights (number: )
[ ] Television set (channel: )
[ ] Engine
[ ] Telephone
[ ] Radar
[ ] Other:
1.9 Did you see the phenomenon directly with your eyes? Yes
CNES-GEIPAN STANDARD INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE V2.01 - Page 8
1.10 Indicate the presence of installations within a 20 km radius:
If you can, indicate these locations on a map or Google Map image.
[ ] Power plan
[ ] Discotheque
[X] Commercial area
[X] Military area
[ ] Nuclear plant
[ ] Stadium
[X] Highway
[X] Radio antennas
[ ] solar plant
[X] Airoprt ENTZHEIM
[ ] Harbor, lighthouse
[ ] Phone antennas
[ ] Wind turbine
[ ] Power line
[ ] Railyway
[X] Industrial area
[ ] Plant. Specify the type(s) of associated activity(ies): No industrial activity in HEILIGENBERG
[ ] Property or castle hosting manifestations (weddings, parties):
[ ] Other, specify:
Additional details on the installations, if necessary:
1.11 Were there known sources of noises at the time of the observation, were these noises intense, permanents: (chat, planes engines, car, electric engines, television sets, radio):
Only the noise of the plane (usual sound)
CNES-GEIPAN STANDARD INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE V2.01 - Page 9
Try to take one or several photos of your observations places. Photos are of a great help for the investigation.
1.12 What was your visibility at the time of the 'observation?
good (no clouds) and sun seen on the South, so no obstacle during the visualisation.
1.13 Were there objects between you and the phenomenon during the observation? No
[ ] Camera
[ ] Window
[ ] Tinted window
[ ] Window with steam
[ ] Video device
[ ] Glasses
[ ] Binocular
[ ] Telescope
[ ] Other:
If you used an optical device, specify the model, its key features. If you were behind a tinted window, specify its color, etc.:
1.14 What was the minimum distance to the observed phenomenon? Try to justify this assessment.
About 10.0000m (Airliner)
1.15 Describe everything that hindered the observation.
1.16 Was the observation constant or interrupted?
Constant
CNES-GEIPAN STANDARD INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE V2.01 - Page 10
This part of the questionnaire it to precisely describe the appearance of the phenomenon, from its shape, size, color, brightness, noise, trajectory etc. ... Remember, every detail is important.
2.1 Describe the observed phenomenon by giving as many details as possible, indicate the mains color or the colors, its dimension, its luminosity, its noise, the number.
(Do not hesitate to compare the global shape to a known object)
Global shape of the phenomenon.
Airliner heading North
3 objects * (See NARRATIVE) following the tail
of the Aircraft. *(undefined color)
CNES-GEIPAN STANDARD INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE V2.01 - Page 11
Each step corresponds to an episode of your observation. Each notable change of behavior, activity, shape of trajectory must be described by a different step.
Times (Start time, end time, duration) | Place of observation (where were you exactly?) | Direction of observation Horizontal (cardinal direction, geographic landmarks or numbered) Vertical (between the horizon and the zenith or numbered) |
Speed (numbered or other) | Direction of displacement of the phenomenon (it was going in the direction of, type of movements) | Shape; Luminosity; Colors; Noises and other details |
NOON min 03 | HEILIGENBERG | ? | To the North | Airliner noise |
Opinion of the air traffic control center of the Air Force:
A supply axis was in TSA22 at that time. We identified that it could be the three tracks shown on the return: a C135 with two Rafale in axis exit.
Given the orientation of the sun at the time, it is possible that the person associated these luminous spots with the reflections on those fighters who were in inside bend over Heiligenberg. A Mirage 2000 was also in fueling phase during the release but in view of its proximity relative to the tanker, its trajectory appears to be confused with that of the tanker.
Furthermore, we have no further contact between 10h30z 11h30z on this sector that could match the description.
Radar tracks:
[Image of the radar tracks record.]
The case is solved, obviously.
Above: A KC-135 Stratotanker refuleing a Dassault Rafale and a Dassault Mirage 2000 jet fighters.
From the witness narrative, it appears he did wonder whether the objects were supersonic jets. It seemed he gave up this explanation because he had not heard any "supersonic" jet noise. But of course, as the supersonic jets were wollowing the subsonic KC-135, they produced a subsonic noise only, and it was certainly mixed and covered by the similar and more powerful noise of the KC-135.
Jet fighters in aerial refueling.
* = Source is available to me.
? = Source I am told about but could not get so far. Help needed.
Main author: | Patrick Gross |
---|---|
Contributors: | None |
Reviewers: | None |
Editeur: | Patrick Gross |
Version: | Create/changed by: | Date: | Description: |
---|---|---|---|
0.1 | Patrick Gross | April 12, 2016 | Creation, [gei1]. |
1.0 | Patrick Gross | April 12, 2016 | First published. |